I hope you enjoy

An odd combination of Reformed theology posts, Bob Dylan out takes, gluten-free recipes, thoughts of mine, and anything else I find interesting on the interwebs. I hope you enjoy.

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Sanctification

"All perfectionism is essentially a disastrous misunderstanding of how God works in sanctification. Sanctification is a process by which God—working in believers through the Holy Spirit—gradually moves them toward Christlikeness (2 Corinthians 3:18). That the transformation is gradual—not instantaneous, and never complete in this lifetime—is confirmed by many passages of Scripture.

As we noted earlier, Paul wrote near the end of his ministry that he was not yet perfect (Philippians 3:12). He told the Romans, "Be [constantly being] transformed by the renewing of your mind" (Romans 12:2). And to the Galatians he wrote that he labored with them "until Christ is formed in you" (Galatians 4:19). Sanctification will not end "until we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ" (Ephesians 4:13). He urged them to stop being children, susceptible to error and trends. How were they to do that? By seeking a sudden experience? No, he wrote, "Grow up in all aspects into Him, who is the head, even Christ" (Ephesians 4:14‑15, emphasis added).

Likewise Peter instructed believers to "grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ" (2 Peter 3:18). He wrote, "Like newborn babies, long for the pure milk of the word, so that by it you may grow in respect to salvation" (1 Peter 2:2)."
                 -  John MacArthur

Thoughts on 2 Corinthians 4:3-4

Problem not the seed it's the sower
Its the unreceptive, fallen, deceitful human heart, that must be changed from stone to flesh. Paul is saying I will not manipulate the message to seem more appealing or change it to be more popular. God's message does not change, and despite my feeble and flailing efforts, His word will not go in vain. I will proclaim Christ and Him crucified, and not water down the message for the sake if being popular or being liked. I don't expect popularity, and neither should you. Paul certainly didn't. He knew that the Gospel message would be offensive to the natural man. Unless God performs a miracle in someone's life, he will never come to God on his own accord. It's impossible. They are slaves to sin, in Romans.
Paul knew the power of forgiveness, he had sought out Christians to kill them. He was there when they stoned Stephen, the first martyr. He was holding the coats. Imagine after they killed Stephen he was standing probably close by, approving and probably thinking justice was served. And then after Stephen was dead, handing everyone their coats back and going on with their lives
Little did Saul know at the time, but he was headed for a supernatural encounter with the true and living God on his way to Damascus.
                       -  T. Meiers

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Total Depravity

"The Bible teaches the total depravity of the human race. Total depravity means radical corruption. We must be careful to note the difference between total depravity and "utter" depravity. To be utterly depraved is to be as wicked as one could possibly be. Hitler was extremely depraved, but he could have been worse than he was. I am sinner. Yet I could sin more often and more severely than I actually do. I am not utterly depraved, but I am totally depraved. For total depravity means that I and everyone else are
depraved or corrupt in the totality of our being. There is no part of us that is left untouched by sin. Our minds, our wills, and our bodies are affected by evil. We speak sinful words, do sinful deeds, have impure thoughts. Our very bodies suffer from the ravages of sin."
                           -  R.C. Sproul

In Response to an Arminian

"You may try and discredit Reformed Theology all you like, I only suggest you do it accurately. A question you should ask yourself is, if the Holy Spirit is working in all persons equally, why do some people respond to the gospel and not others? Are some people more naturally responsive to spiritual things? Why the desire for Christ in some and not others? Where did it come from? It is either God's grace that makes us differ or it is something in autonomous man. It seems pretty obvious that to believe it is ultimately up to man is to make God's grace penultimate and man's faith ultimate so that man can boast over another who does not have faith. Only as we recognize that we exercise faith because of God's mercy do we give him all the glory (Rom 9:16). What we cannot and will not do for ourselves Christ does for us."
                         -  John Hendryx

Predestination and Evangelism


"Predestination in no way hinders the zeal of the evangelist; rather the contrary. For as we know that God foreknows his own (though we have no idea who they might be) we can be sure that those (and only those) will finally believe and turn to Christ. For their sake the church is willing to preach the gospel far and wide. "For many are called but few are chosen." The call goes out to all and sundry, but the fact that many continue in unbelief is to be traced to their corruption and sinfulness. "For men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone who does evil hates the light..." ...As Calvinists present Christ to a fallen world they do not do so believing that people have power within themselves to turn to Christ. They do so because they believe in the power of the Spirit to resurrect dead bones and make them live (Ezekiel.). Their faith is in the power of God, not in the goodness of men...Men are unable to believe: "How can you believe who receive honour from one another and not the honour that comes from the only God?" (free translation). "Therefore I said unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father" (John 6:65). "A man can receive nothing, except it be given unto him from heaven" (John 3:27; cf. 1 Corinthians 4:7)...Because of original sin and all it entails, men are unable and unwilling to believe; but God can make them willing to believe. For what is impossible for men is possible with God!".         -   Paul Mizzi

The Reformed Doctrine of God


"Over the years, I've had opportunities to teach systematic theology in a variety of settings, from seminary classrooms to university courses to Sunday school classes in the local church. But no matter where I've taught systematics, the first place I typically start is the doctrine of God. Theology, of course, studies God and His character and ways, so it's appropriate to begin with a look at His nature and attributes before examining what the Bible has to say about redemption, the church, the last things, and the other categories of systematic theology.

Whenever I've taught the doctrine of God, I've started out with two statements that have seemed to fill many of my students with no small amount of consternation. It's been my practice to tell them that on the one hand there's nothing particularly unique about the doctrine of God confessed in the Reformed tradition of Christian theology. Presbyterians, Reformed Baptists, the Dutch Reformed, and other Reformed Christians affirm the same attributes of God that Lutherans, Anglicans, Methodists, the Eastern Orthodox, and Roman Catholics all do. There's nothing radically different about our doctrine of God.

Yet, when those same students have asked me what's the most significant distinctive of Reformed theology, I've said it's our doctrine of God. Now, that does sound completely contradictory to my first statement, but I say that the Reformed doctrine of God sets us apart from other traditions for the reason that I know of no other theology that takes seriously the doctrine of God with respect to every other doctrine. In most systematic theologies, you get an affirmation of the sovereignty of God on page one of your theology text, but then once you move on to soteriology (doctrine of salvation), eschatology (doctrine of last things), and anthropology (doctrine of humanity), and so on, the author has seemingly forgotten what he said about God's sovereignty on page one."
                    -  R. C. Sproul

Post Below

From Ligonier Ministries and R.C. Sproul. © Tabletalk magazine. Website: www.ligonier.org/tabletalk. Email: tabletalk@ligonier.org. Toll free: 1-800-435-4343.

The Reformed Doctrine of God


"Over the years, I've had opportunities to teach systematic theology in a variety of settings, from seminary classrooms to university courses to Sunday school classes in the local church. But no matter where I've taught systematics, the first place I typically start is the doctrine of God. Theology, of course, studies God and His character and ways, so it's appropriate to begin with a look at His nature and attributes before examining what the Bible has to say about redemption, the church, the last things, and the other categories of systematic theology.

Whenever I've taught the doctrine of God, I've started out with two statements that have seemed to fill many of my students with no small amount of consternation. It's been my practice to tell them that on the one hand there's nothing particularly unique about the doctrine of God confessed in the Reformed tradition of Christian theology. Presbyterians, Reformed Baptists, the Dutch Reformed, and other Reformed Christians affirm the same attributes of God that Lutherans, Anglicans, Methodists, the Eastern Orthodox, and Roman Catholics all do. There's nothing radically different about our doctrine of God.

Yet, when those same students have asked me what's the most significant distinctive of Reformed theology, I've said it's our doctrine of God. Now, that does sound completely contradictory to my first statement, but I say that the Reformed doctrine of God sets us apart from other traditions for the reason that I know of no other theology that takes seriously the doctrine of God with respect to every other doctrine. In most systematic theologies, you get an affirmation of the sovereignty of God on page one of your theology text, but then once you move on to soteriology (doctrine of salvation), eschatology (doctrine of last things), and anthropology (doctrine of humanity), and so on, the author has seemingly forgotten what he said about God's sovereignty on page one."
                    -  R. C. Sproul

Monday, June 8, 2015

The World's Theology

"The world's theology is easy to define. It is the view that human beings are basically good, that no one is really lost, that belief in Jesus Christ is not necessary for salvation."

- James Montgomery Boice
Foundations of the Christian Faith

The Divine Progression of Grace

-  Bob Santos
Blazing a trail to fruitful living. This book is all about grace. In the Preface the author asks "What you might wonder, does God's grace have to do with blazing a trail? Actually, a lot." And "Grace, by it's very nature, creates radical changes in our own lives and in the lives of those we touch with God's love."
It is essential to have a firm foundation to understand fully what grace is. And this book will help you understand that grace is active. God has given His grace to us so we can show others grace. Even in our fallen state, we can show grace to our fellow human beings, and therefore show them God's love.
The author is founder and president of Search Me Ministries.
In the chapter titled Empowered to Serve, the author tackles a tough issue in the church, cessationists vs. continuationists.
The author states he himself is a continuationist, and offers some argument for his position. Although I can respectfully disagree with his position, I appreciate his honesty.


Duties of Husbands and Wives

http://www.the-highway.com/familyduty_Steele.html

Sunday, June 7, 2015

Your Conscience

"It was Jiminy Cricket who said, 'Always let your conscience be your guide.' This is good advice if our conscience is informed and ruled by the Word of God. However, if our conscience is ignorant of Scripture or has been seared or hardened by repeated
sin, then Jiminy Cricket theology is disastrous."
-R.C. Sproul, Sr.

Election

http://the-highway.com/election3_Boettner.html

Unconditional Election

"The Doctrine of Election is to be looked upon as only a particular application of the general doctrine of Predestination or Foreordination as it relates to the salvation of sinners; and since the Scriptures are concerned mainly with the redemption of sinners, this part of the doctrine is naturally thrown up into a place of special prominence, it partakes of all the elements of the general doctrine; and since it is the act of an infinite moral Person, it is represented as being the eternal, absolute, immutable, effective determination by His will of the objects of His saving operations. And no aspect of this elective choice is more constantly emphasized than that of its absolute sovereignty
The Reformed Faith has held to the existence of an eternal, divine decree which, antecedently to any difference or desert in men themselves, separates the human race into two portions and ordains one to everlasting life and the other to everlasting death. So far as this decree relates to men it designates the counsel of God concerning those who had a supremely favorable chance in Adam to earn salvation, but who lost that chance. As a result of the fall they are guilty and corrupted; their motives are wrong and they cannot work out their own salvation. They have forfeited all claim upon God's mercy, and might justly have been left to suffer the penalty of their disobedience as all of the fallen angels were left. But instead the elect members of this race are rescued from this state of guilt and sin and are brought into a state of blessedness and holiness. The non-elect are simply left in their previous state of ruin, and are condemned for their sins. They suffer no unmerited punishment, for God is dealing with them not merely as men but as sinners."
          -  Loraine Boetnner

Do Not Be Afraid

"The one who formed you says: Do not be afraid, for I have ransomed you. I have called you by name; you are mine. When you go through deep waters, I will be with you. When you go through rivers of difficulty, you will not drown. When you walk through the fire of oppression, you will not be burned up; the flames will not consume you. For I am the Lord, your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Savior!" (Isaiah 43:1-3).
He is indeed Emmanuel, "God with us." "The LORD Almighty is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge" (Psalm 46:11).
Is not our failure to realize the favorable presence of our divine Redeemer the main cause of our slackness in communion and carelessness in our walk? Does not that failure explain our weakness, irresolution, timidity? Christ is present to counsel, to direct our way, to shelter, to energize, to comfort. Then make use of Him: draw from Him, lean upon Him. Does He not say, "Don't be afraid, for I am with you. Don't be discouraged, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you. I will hold you up with my victorious right hand!" (Isaiah 41:10) Then conduct yourself accordingly, Christian reader."~ Arthur Pink, "His Presence"

Saturday, June 6, 2015

Emotions and Passion

"Sometimes we have really incredible emotional experiences, and we ride on their fumes for as long as they will last, and then we lose confidence, passion, and focus. We're like junkies, always searching for the new high, and we go to camps, conferences, worship services, all in an effort to get that high. It should be obvious to us that this cycle is very self-focused approach to our walk with God, but because of our flesh, it isn't. We make it all about us, but the essence of the Christian life is the polar opposite, it's about others; God first, our neighbor second. But what's more, our faith is tied to these experiences. If we don't feel good, maybe God doesn't love anymore. We want an experience as God's proof that he loves us, and that he forgives us, and that we are his children, but experiences aren't what God want's our focus to be on.
Our focus needs to be on the scripture. Now that might sound a little boring to you, but first of all, I'd say you don't understand how glorious God's word is, and secondly, why else didn't Jesus give these men an experience? This was a long walk they were on, and Jesus spent all of it talking to them about God's word. He wanted them to be focus on the revealed written word of God.
But why? The Bible is outside of us, it never changes. It says the same thing now as it did a thousand years ago and the same as the thousand years before that. God's word is the same whether we've had our full eight hours rest, or if we're pulling an all-nighter. Scripture is just as true when we are starving as it is when we are full. It's not affected by us and our fickle imagination. Jesus was showing these two disciples everything they should have already known and understood from the Old Testament. They weren't believing the scriptures, and without that, it didn't matter how many experiences these men had, their faith would always be on shaky ground.
Consider Romans 10:17, "So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ." Notice the absence of some super spiritual experience. God's gracious gift of saving and sanctifying faith comes to us through God's word. Peter says almost the exact same thing in chapter 1 verse 23 of his first epistle, "Since you have been born again, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God." These men needed their faith strengthened, and Jesus thought it was important that their faith be built upon the solid rock of His word, rather than even a real, true experience. Peter was at the transfiguration event of Christ, a real experience, but even with something like that in his memory, he says, "and we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed." Peter is not saying that God's word is more confirmed by his experience, as if its truthfulness was in question, but rather, he is saying that the scripture is more fully confirmed than even the most amazing spiritual experience man has ever known.
What about us? It's not a complicated application, and it's nothing new. Sola Scriptura, which is Latin for Scripture Alone. Scripture is what we base our faith and understanding of God on, and nothing else. We look To God's word as our source of faith, strength, and guidance. It is sufficient and efficient for these things. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 says, "All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work."
May God grant us the grace to love his Word more and more.
Like"
           -  Marshall Proctor from The Calvinist Lounge (used with permission)